the trailer showed nothing that has not been in any cod game so far...using a turret, getting ammo from a teammate, using an ac130, driving a boat...unless i can choose to do all of these things in an open world war environment (now theres a novel idea, not like cod would actually attempt to do this tho), then this is just cod 4.5 following yet another linear single player experience
and since when do ppl play fps's for their single player? seriously? if you want a good innovative single player game go buy Alan Wake
idk bout you guys but i play my shooters for the multiplayer...hence why bf3 > cod...if im spending 60 bucks (90-100 in cods case after the dlc) i want a decent multiplayer experience...not mw2.5...and why did they decide not to show ANY multi in the FIRST major trailer/announcement of the game when they know that is what ppl wanted to see and want to know about...because it is not going to do anything innovative so they need to play off the "end of the trilogy/omg look its world war 3 we turned the M upside down" strategy
i told myself i would wait til the trailer to decide on my purchase, a trailer is made to promote a purchase by showing the greatest aspects of the game/movie...well, this trailer easily helped me make my decision, no thanks cod, get ur 60 bucks somewhere else im sure you will anyway