The DUMBEST thing is this game.......

Out of ammo? Have a teammate shoot you and then you would have full ammo, grenades, equipment and everything else. Would hardly be balanced.

[quote user="Coram Deo Vita"]

Out of ammo? Have a teammate shoot you and then you would have full ammo, grenades, equipment and everything else. Would hardly be balanced.

[/quote]

This. Plus, I can just imagine... "Dude, he's gonna get me! Shoot me!"

[quote user="Coram Deo Vita"]

Out of ammo? Have a teammate shoot you and then you would have full ammo, grenades, equipment and everything else. Would hardly be balanced.

[/quote]

/topic

Don't kill me, I'm not insured!

i actually like the idea.. hey previously it counted as a death , now THAT was a dumb idea. kill streaks are over rated , if you cant get a good KD without dogs or choppers then honestly  , is this really that important of a topic ?

[quote user="oYMo MOST HATED"]Real smart geniust[/quote]

[quote user="oYMo MOST HATED"]

Real smart geniust...

Hello pot... Meet kettle.

Before commenting on someone's intelligence, check a dictionary... Genius!

"Out of ammo? Have a teammate shoot you and then you would have full ammo, grenades, equipment and everything else. Would hardly be balanced."

Uhhh what?

[quote user="The Junior V"]

Hello pot... Meet kettle.

Before commenting on someone's intelligence, check a dictionary... Genius!

[/quote] 

Sorry I didn't proofread my post to satisfy Junior V the Great.

[quote user="oYMo MOST HATED"]

"Out of ammo? Have a teammate shoot you and then you would have full ammo, grenades, equipment and everything else. Would hardly be balanced."

Uhhh what?

They are saying that what you're suggesting would affect game balance. It'd be easy to be one away from a blackbird out of ammo and about to die, but have a teammate kill you before the enemy can. Then you'd have full ammo and be one away from a game changing KSR.

It's fine how it is.