Crysis 3 Gameplay Trailer

You can check it out below.

[view:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8PdGUZauShA]
I am interested in the game as I rather enjoyed the campaign of Crysis 2 and the multiplayer was pretty fun. Hopefully with the game having New York as the location once again, it will be truly demolished with wildlife so that we barely even recognise it from the first game. What do you think?

 

Discussion Info


Last updated July 4, 2018 Views 1 Applies to:

* Please try a lower page number.

* Please enter only numbers.

* Please try a lower page number.

* Please enter only numbers.

I never understood all that hate Crysis 2 got. Great single player campaign and one of the best multiplayer components this gen. Still playing it to this day. Sadly it didn't catch on as much as I had hoped.

[quote user="ConquerStone"]

I never understood all that hate Crysis 2 got. Great single player campaign and one of the best multiplayer components this gen. Still playing it to this day. Sadly it didn't catch on as much as I had hoped.

[/quote]

1. Because it was in NYC

2. Because it was in a city instead of a wildlife environment

3. Because the mp was way to much like COD.

Its returning back to NYC again, so hopefully the overgrown wildlife truly changes the experience to feel more outdoors. Otherwise you can expect about the same feedback for Crysis 3 that Crysis 2 received.  Graphically Crysis 2 was one of the best looking games I played on the 360. Just stunning.  Cant wait to see what Crysis 3 looks like.  That bow is sick.

Looks really good can't wait till 2013.

Previously known as Win7Xbox 360

The bow is sick, looking forward to the new scenery in NYC

I'm getting really sick of all these FPS games set in the "modern/near-future;" this setting has become more overdone than WW2 games were a decade ago!

That being said, I enjoyed Crysis 2- it felt like a sped up COD. I'm interested in 3, especially if it gets a longer singleplayer campaign...

At least Crysis is a significantly different experience.... Call of Duty, Battlefield and Medal of Honour are just a little tired. I don't mind as far as the experience goes, but the experience is different for everyone and as far as general interest in gaming, well, it's hardly a good thing.

Drysis 2 was not a new experience...

[quote user="ChainSmokingBob"]

At least Crysis is a significantly different experience.... Call of Duty, Battlefield and Medal of Honour are just a little tired. I don't mind as far as the experience goes, but the experience is different for everyone and as far as general interest in gaming, well, it's hardly a good thing.

[/quote]
That is what I thought. I enjoy Battlefield but when people compare it to Call of Duty, they should be mentioning that it is a better game, because in my opinion it had everything COD had but made it better. It had the control scheme and feel of the gameplay that Call of Duty had which is an easy to pick up and play game, but being Super Soldiers that can jump high, go invisible etc just made it even better. I wish Crysis 2 was up there on the "best mulitplayer games", it was quite underrated for what it was.

Those the same sound fx used in the Prometheus trailer? Anyway, why does everyone gripe so damn much about FPS titles... ? They're FIRST-PERSON SHOOTERS... It's the genre.--if one is tired of shooting guns, a military backdrop or a "modern" setting, then play a frickin action/adventure title for a change. I mean, you aren't going to see me complaining about side-scrolling platformers saying I'm sick of jumping on colorful baddies in a cartoony setting.

Actually looking forward to Crysis 3. Really happy with Crysis 2, so hopefully 3 will be even better. ^_^

* Please try a lower page number.

* Please enter only numbers.

* Please try a lower page number.

* Please enter only numbers.