GPU in Xbox One

I would not know. I'm one of those people who is happy to have a general idea of how something works, but nothing much more techy or numbers based than that.

If you read misterxmedia lately they are basically talking about what you just said about working as 2. Some say yes the GPU is 1.3 TF but what you are seeing from rise is mostly coming from the co processors and other rendering functions outside of that 1.3 Raw number. Estimated at this stage to be 3.2 TF performance wise. Only 1st party Devs fully privy to how some of it works and is still not fully utilised by them.

So... Xbox One graphics are only just beginning to wow us then?

Thing with consoles is that people are expecting them to work exactly like PC's. They may share similar architecture, but they still have their own custom builds that allow them to harness the technology within them in ways a standard PC simply would not. Then there's coding to the metal on top of that.

Imagine where those games will be in a year or two....prepare to have your socks blown off  :D

Yes I believe so.

I think this is best covered by semiaccurate...

semiaccurate.com/.../a-deep-dive-in-to-microsofts-xbox-one-gpu-and-on-die-memory

As you can see 2xcompute command processors & 2xgraphics command processor. It also says 1.3tflops, so I think that still stands.

Misterxmedia is a bit of a joke really... that said i'm still excited at the hardware in the Xbox One....

Seeing the games in the flesh left me disappointed graphics wise, even Ryse, but they were just demos and as the late Uncle Ben said (and I quote directly) "with great power comes a long wait for it all to be utilised" in a few years the graphics will be awesome, I imagine (and hope) like the graphical comparison between Halo 3 and Halo 4 this gen

@cotton agreed. I think the comments section of misterx is well worth a read more than the Main article. As I've always said a more customized soc on the x1 will produce the goods.

@RippenHarra I read Misterx pretty much every day, only understand about a third of what is explained on there, but I get the general idea.