Hello Team,
I am planning to create one MS Team App having custom Bot and Connector(Incoming webhook). Do I get support of both features for MS team in GCC-High and DOD environments? Can someone share the how?
Any example would be appreciated.
March 10, 2025
Hello Team,
I am planning to create one MS Team App having custom Bot and Connector(Incoming webhook). Do I get support of both features for MS team in GCC-High and DOD environments? Can someone share the how?
Any example would be appreciated.
Reported content has been submitted
Hello Hasit P, I'm Segunfunmi, an Independent Advisor and Microsoft user like you. Thank you for posting your query in this forum. Thank you for your question. Yes, creating a custom bot for MS Teams in both GCC-High and DOD environments is possible. However, custom connectors are not available in these environments. To configure a bot for these environments, you need an account in the Azure Government cloud and an Azure Bot resource created in the Office 365 GCC High environment. Your bot project should be in C# or JavaScript and use Bot Framework SDK version 4.14 or later. You must also ensure that your bot uses the cloud adapter, which lets you specify settings specific to the Azure Government cloud and the Office 365 GCC High environment. Only the Microsoft Teams channel is available in the Office 365 GCC High environment. Also, image URLs in Adaptive Cards aren’t supported in GCC-High and DOD environments. You can replace an image URL with Base64-encoded DataUri. For more detailed instructions, you can refer to the official Microsoft documentation. Unfortunately, custom connectors are not currently supported in GCC-High and DOD environments. However, for GCC High, bots and message extensions are now available in Microsoft Teams. Please evaluate the risk and compliance of any endpoint and URL you connect to, ensuring it meets your compliance requirements, including FedRAMP, DFARS, ITAR, etc. Sources: https://learn.microsoft.com/azure/bot-service/how-to-deploy-gov-cloud-high?view=azure-bot-service-4.0&tabs=csharp https://learn.microsoft.com/microsoftteams/platform/bots/what-are-bots Please let me know if you have any questions or need further assistance. Kind regards, Segunfunmi.
Reported content has been submitted
Was this reply helpful?
Sorry this didn't help.
Great! Thanks for your feedback.
How satisfied are you with this reply?
Thanks for your feedback, it helps us improve the site.
How satisfied are you with this reply?
Thanks for your feedback.
Thank you for the detailed response.
Most of the documents i referred related to the support of Connectors in teams gov cloud states that webhooks and connectors aren't supported in these two environments (GCC-High and DOD).
But this roadmap of mircosoft teams indicates that Custom connectors and webhooks are already lauched in GCC-High and DOD environments.
Could you please confirm?
Reported content has been submitted
Was this reply helpful?
Sorry this didn't help.
Great! Thanks for your feedback.
How satisfied are you with this reply?
Thanks for your feedback, it helps us improve the site.
How satisfied are you with this reply?
Thanks for your feedback.
We are using botframework-connector SDK for python for implementating bot, in that we would like to retrive user's conversation ID whenever user install teams bot in personal scope or groupchat.
To get conversation id we were listening on_installation_update_add event of botbuilder.core.teams.TeamsActivityHandler and using turn_context.activity.conversation.id to that get conversation id.
1. Is there any expiry time for this conversation ID?
2. Can i believe that conversation id would be unique globally (Across multiple orgs)? which refers unique connection between user and bot.
3. Can i flooded a message (adaptive card) on the same conversation id within teams bot limits
Reported content has been submitted
Was this reply helpful?
Sorry this didn't help.
Great! Thanks for your feedback.
How satisfied are you with this reply?
Thanks for your feedback, it helps us improve the site.
How satisfied are you with this reply?
Thanks for your feedback.